TSE Querier
Goals
- to introduce the TSE Querier
- to learn another form of testing: fuzz testing
- to learn about expressions and operator precedence
Activity
Today activity about the design of the querier.
The Querier
The third component of the Tiny Search Engine is the Querier, which reads the index produced by the Indexer and the page files produced by the Crawler, to interactively answer written queries entered by the user.
Our Querier loads the index into memory (a data structure we developed for the Indexer) and then prompts the user for queries.
Queries are comprised of words, with optional and
/or
operators.
For example,
computer science
computer and science
computer or science
baseball or basketball or ultimate frisbee
The first two examples are treated identically, matching only documents that have both words - not necessarily together (as in the phrase “computer science”). The third picks up documents that have either word. The fourth matches documents that mention baseball, or basketball, or both “ultimate” and the word “frisbee” (not necessarily together).
Here’s an example run with the provided crawled pages and index file with the letters seed URL at depth 6. The TSE output is also available at the plank server under /thayerfs/courses/22fall/cosc050/workspace/tse/tse-output
.
$ loc=/thayerfs/courses/22fall/cosc050/workspace/tse/tse-output/
$ ./querier $loc/letters-depth-6 $loc/letters-index-6
Query? first and search
Query: first and search
Matches 2 documents (ranked):
score 1 doc 3: http://cs50tse.cs.dartmouth.edu/tse/letters/B.html
score 1 doc 8: http://cs50tse.cs.dartmouth.edu/tse/letters/D.html
-----------------------------------------------
Query? tiny search engine
Query: tiny search engine
No documents match.
-----------------------------------------------
Query? NOTE we LOWERcase the query
Query: note we lowercase the query
No documents match.
-----------------------------------------------
Query? spaces do not matter
Query: spaces do not matter
No documents match.
-----------------------------------------------
Query? non-letter characters are disallowed
Error: bad character '-' in query.
Query? even digits as in cs50
Error: bad character '5' in query.
Query? and
Query: and
Error: 'and' cannot be first
Query? or
Query: or
Error: 'or' cannot be first
Query? what about and
Query: what about and
Error: 'and' cannot be last
Query? what about or
Query: what about or
Error: 'or' cannot be last
Query? ^D
Let’s study the Requirements Spec (located under querier/ directory of your tse repo) for the Querier, and run some demos.
Fuzz Testing
In a recent lecture we talked about unit testing, and the difference between glass-box testing and black-box testing. Usually, these tests are based on a carefully constructed series of test cases, devised to test all code sequences and push on the “edge cases”.
However, such tests are only as good as the test writer - who must logically study the code (for glass-box testing) or the specs (for black-box testing) to think of the suitable test cases. It’s possible they will miss some important cases.
Another solution, therefore, is fuzz testing, a form of black-box testing in which you fire thousands of random inputs at the program to see how it reacts. The chances of triggering an unconsidered test case is far greater if you try a lot of cases!
Here is a fuzz-testing program for our querier. It generates a series of random queries on stdout, which it then pipes to the querier on stdin. Here’s the core of the fuzz tester:
/**************** generate_query ****************/
/* generate one random query and print to stdout.
* pull random words from the wordlist and from the dictionary.
*/
static void
generate_query(const wordlist_t *wordlist, const wordlist_t *dictionary)
{
// some parameters that affect query generation
const int max_words = 6; // generate 1..max_words
const float or_probability = 0.3; // P(OR between two words)
const float and_probability = 0.2; // P(AND between two words)
const float dict_probability = 0.2; // P(draw from dict instead of wordlist)
int qwords = random() % max_words + 1; // number of words in query
for (int qw = 0; qw < qwords; qw++) {
// draw a word either dictionary or wordlist
if ((random() % 100) < (dict_probability * 100)) {
printf("%s ", dictionary->words[random() % dictionary->nwords]);
} else {
printf("%s ", wordlist->words[random() % wordlist->nwords]);
}
// last word?
if (qw < qwords-1) {
// which operator to print?
int op = random() % 100;
if (op < (and_probability * 100)) {
printf("AND ");
}
else if (op < (and_probability * 100 + or_probability * 100)) {
printf("OR ");
}
}
}
printf("\n");
}
Here’s the output of 10 random queries:
$ ./fuzzquery $loc/letters-index-6 10 0
./fuzzquery: generating 10 queries from 22 words
fourier AND traversal
this OR the the OR tse computational
biology playground OR computational
answers breadth search OR computational OR Mississippians OR fast
algorithm OR coding eniac the AND home OR breadth
traversal computational playground coding OR the
fast
search the OR fast
home
transform OR huffman OR depth AND graph AND transform
And here’s what happens when we pipe it to our querier:
$ ./fuzzquery $loc/letters-index-6 10 0 | ./querier $loc/letters-depth-6 $loc/letters-index-6
./fuzzquery: generating 10 queries from 22 words
Query: fourier and traversal
No documents match.
-----------------------------------------------
Query: this or the the or tse computational
Matches 1 documents (ranked):
score 2 doc 1: http://cs50tse.cs.dartmouth.edu/tse/letters/index.html
-----------------------------------------------
Query: biology playground or computational
Matches 1 documents (ranked):
score 1 doc 9: http://cs50tse.cs.dartmouth.edu/tse/letters/C.html
-----------------------------------------------
Query: answers breadth search or computational or mississippians or fast
Matches 2 documents (ranked):
score 1 doc 9: http://cs50tse.cs.dartmouth.edu/tse/letters/C.html
score 1 doc 7: http://cs50tse.cs.dartmouth.edu/tse/letters/F.html
-----------------------------------------------
Query: algorithm or coding eniac the and home or breadth
Matches 2 documents (ranked):
score 1 doc 2: http://cs50tse.cs.dartmouth.edu/tse/letters/A.html
score 1 doc 3: http://cs50tse.cs.dartmouth.edu/tse/letters/B.html
-----------------------------------------------
Query: traversal computational playground coding or the
Matches 1 documents (ranked):
score 1 doc 1: http://cs50tse.cs.dartmouth.edu/tse/letters/index.html
-----------------------------------------------
Query: fast
Matches 1 documents (ranked):
score 1 doc 7: http://cs50tse.cs.dartmouth.edu/tse/letters/F.html
-----------------------------------------------
Query: search the or fast
Matches 1 documents (ranked):
score 1 doc 7: http://cs50tse.cs.dartmouth.edu/tse/letters/F.html
-----------------------------------------------
Query: home
Matches 9 documents (ranked):
score 2 doc 1: http://cs50tse.cs.dartmouth.edu/tse/letters/index.html
score 1 doc 2: http://cs50tse.cs.dartmouth.edu/tse/letters/A.html
score 1 doc 3: http://cs50tse.cs.dartmouth.edu/tse/letters/B.html
score 1 doc 4: http://cs50tse.cs.dartmouth.edu/tse/letters/E.html
score 1 doc 5: http://cs50tse.cs.dartmouth.edu/tse/letters/G.html
score 1 doc 6: http://cs50tse.cs.dartmouth.edu/tse/letters/H.html
score 1 doc 7: http://cs50tse.cs.dartmouth.edu/tse/letters/F.html
score 1 doc 8: http://cs50tse.cs.dartmouth.edu/tse/letters/D.html
score 1 doc 9: http://cs50tse.cs.dartmouth.edu/tse/letters/C.html
-----------------------------------------------
Query: transform or huffman or depth and graph and transform
Matches 2 documents (ranked):
score 1 doc 7: http://cs50tse.cs.dartmouth.edu/tse/letters/F.html
score 1 doc 6: http://cs50tse.cs.dartmouth.edu/tse/letters/H.html
We could generate a different series of random queries by changing the random seed, and we can run a lot more queries, too!
The fuzz tester does not test all aspects of the querier; in particular, it will not generate syntactically incorrect inputs. Those should be tested by another program, perhaps another fuzz tester. Furthermore, it does not verify whether the querier actually produces the right answers!
For regression testing, we might save the querier output in a file, and then compare the output of a fresh test run against the saved results from earlier runs. If we had earlier believed those results to be correct, then seeing unchanged output would presumably indicate the results (and thus the new code) are still correct.